The Crown: Royal Tradition or Divine Calling?

The first thing you hear when pressing play on the new Netflix original series The Crown is the repeated coughs of a dying king. He isn’t aware of the seriousness of the blood on his handkerchief, but the implications of the scene aren’t lost on the viewer. King George VI, the stammering monarch who helped bring Britain through WWII (as dramatized in The King Speech), just began his final chapter, setting the stage for his daughter, 25-year-old Elizabeth, to ascend the throne.

The Crown is the most expensive television series ever produced, and it’s not hard to figure out why. While covering the early adult life of Great Britain’s longest living monarch, Netflix pays top dollar ($130 million) to take us back in time to the halls of Buckingham Palace.

And you may even find yourself convinced it’s real.

As the story gets going, we are introduced to a quiet Elizabeth who seems drastically unprepared to begin rule. Surrounded by so many others telling her what to do and how to do it, it takes several episodes for Elizabeth to gain Her Majesty’s queenly presence.

The show runners are sympathetic to some of the controversies and gossip about her marriage to third-cousin Prince Philip, Duke of Edinburgh—but the series doesn’t shy away from it either. Though his eyes seem attracted to waitresses and flight attendants, don’t expect to see a steamy royal affair.

Throughout the series, Prince Philip struggles to acclimate to his role in the background while his career, surname, and freedom seem to be sucked into the Queen’s shadow. As King George VI tells him in episode 2, “The Crown must take precedence.” But he also becomes the voice of modern reason in the series, which comes in contrast to the unending advice of an aged Winston Churchill, who rigorously guides and counsels the Queen to uphold the rich royal traditions.

But the most striking element of this 10-episode series is watching Elizabeth take on the soul-crushing weight of becoming Queen. The series is aptly named “The Crown” because the drama unfolding is no longer about Elizabeth herself, but the goddess-like queen who must shed all traces of human weakness and fragility to ascend the role of Great Britain’s sovereign ruler.
Her relationship with her sister, mother, children, husband and everyone else must eventually transform into the simple, impersonal interactions of a queen and her royal subjects.

In episode 4, the Queen mother, Mary of Teck, offers one of the most poignant mini-speeches of the series, which helps define the purpose of the pomp and pageantry of the office Elizabeth has been forced to accept. As a terrible fog takes over London, Elizabeth asks the Queen mother (her grandmother) about whether she really believes being queen is a calling from God. Mary’s answer:

“Monarchy is God’s sacred mission to grace and dignify the earth, to give ordinary people an ideal to strive towards, an example of nobility and duty to raise them in their wretched lives. Monarchy is a calling from God. That is why you are crowned in an Abbey, not a government building. Why you’re anointed, not appointed. It’s an Arch Bishop that puts the crown on your head, not a minister of public service. Which means you are answerable to God in your duty, not the public.”

No matter what you believe about the role God plays in monarchy, this speech offers a meaningful perspective on how Kings and Queens are supposed to rule—in total submission to God.

Though the series doesn’t get into it much, we can know from what Queen Elizabeth has said throughout her 63-year reign that Christ plays a crucial role in how she carries out her duty. In a recently published book, The Servant Queen and the King She Serves, we get an inside look into the faith of a woman who has learned to depend on Jesus in the good times and the bad.

Whether you enjoy the dramatization of Elizabeth’s early life as Queen or read about her faith in a book, we can all be encouraged that there is a world leader out there who unabashedly proclaims Christ as she seeks to serve her people.

“I know just how much I rely on my faith to guide me through the good times and the bad. Each day is a new beginning. I know that the only way to live my life is to try to do what is right, to take the long view, to give of my best in all that the day brings, and to put my trust in God!” (Queen Elizabeth II, 2002)

Corum Hughes works on the production team for HAVEN Today and is the managing editor of the All About Jesus blog. His passions include running, biking, reading, watching movies, and seeking Jesus in places He is seldom sought. Corum lives with his wife in Idaho.


The Servant Queen and the King she serves

Now in the hands of over a million people, this is one of the most popular books in Britain. The Servant Queen and the King She Serves takes a closer look at the Queen’s personal faith in Jesus and the impact it’s had on her long life of service to the nation.


  • Rebecca Salutric says:

    Is this the Queen Elizabeth who did not make Princess Diana welcome? Is this the Queen who upon Diana’s death did not want her buried where a princess should of been? Sorry she did not show Christ while Diana lived.

    • Corum Hughes says:

      Thanks for your feedback, Rebecca! Without knowing all that went on between Queen Elizabeth and Princess Diana, it’s not the place for this blog to defend or approve of the Queen’s decisions and relationships. The purpose of this post is to instead look at how Elizabeth is portrayed in “The Crown,” while also looking at what the Queen says about her own personal faith.

  • Valerie Jones says:

    In our admiration for both Her Majesty and “The Crown” both very accomplished in their own unique respects, let us not forget our own Founding Fathers, who were not so much “abashed” in their admiration for Christ, but mindful of the oppression that is an inescapable – indeed, foundational – component of monarchy.
    Without rejecting the divine right of kings, and the infallibility of a single (and inevitably political) religion, the United States of America would not have been possible. And without reaffirming freedom of religion as the foundation of democracy, it will not survive. Without the “liberalism” that Dominionists doubtless decry, the few centuries of Enlightenment will flicker out, and humanity will resume millennia of suffering under the caprices of “God-ordained” rulers and their offspring. That said, if true democracy fails in its bid to prevent restoration of “divine” rulers, I’ll happily take good Queen Elizabeth over any Republican pretender seeking to establish a new American theocracy.
    Liberalism first became a distinct political movement during the Age of Enlightenment, when it became popular among philosophers and economists in the Western world. Liberalism rejected the prevailing social and political norms of hereditary privilege, state religion, absolute monarchy, and the Divine Right of Kings. The 17th-century philosopher John Locke is often credited with founding liberalism as a distinct philosophical tradition. Locke argued that each man has a natural right to life, liberty and property,[11] while adding that governments must not violate these rights based on the social contract. Liberals opposed traditional conservatism and sought to replace absolutism in government with representative democracy and the rule of law.
    Leaders in the Glorious Revolution of 1688,[12] the American Revolution of 1776, and the French Revolution of 1789 used liberal philosophy to justify the armed overthrow of royal tyranny.

1 Trackback or Pingback

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *